By Mike Scarcella

(Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department on Friday questioned the fairness of a private $2.8 billion settlement with the National Collegiate Athletic Association, suggesting it might not go far enough to compensate student athletes.

The Biden administration expressed its views in a filing in the federal court in Oakland, California, where the NCAA has been mired in class action litigation with students for years.

The settlement, which requires court approval, would be among the largest-ever recoveries in a class action and allows NCAA member schools to make payments directly to student athletes for the first time.

In addition to the $2.8 billion settlement fund, academic institutions are expected to pay out some $20 billion over the next decade under the terms of the deal.

Justice Department antitrust officials said in their filing that they were concerned about a provision of the 10-year settlement that caps money available for schools to pay athletes.

The filing said, “while the proposed settlement allows for some relief, it still functions as an artificial price cap on what free market competition may otherwise yield.”

It urged the court to reject the settlement or require language that makes clear that the cap does not bar or apply to potential future lawsuits.

The NCAA in a statement said the “settlement reached on behalf of hundreds of thousands of student-athletes is consistent with antitrust law and will create a new era of college sports.”

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Justice Department is not a party in the lawsuit. The NCAA denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.

In a statement, a lead attorney for the plaintiffs, Steve Berman, defended the settlement and said its terms and conditions were clear.

Berman said failure to approve the deal “would scuttle billions of dollars going to student athletes.”

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken will weigh final approval of the settlement at a hearing in April.

The case is In re College Athlete NIL Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-03919-CW.

Read more:

Lawyers in NCAA athlete pay settlement ask for $515 mln legal fee award

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The seal of the U.S. Justice Department is seen on the podium in the Department's headquarters briefing room before a news conference with the Attorney General in Washington, January 24, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

NCAA’s $2.7 bln student athlete settlement wins preliminary court approval

NCAA’s $2.7 billion settlement faces objections from some students


Source link

Best Brokers

Unmatched trading fees, generous bonuses, top notch Regulation Frame.

T&Cs Apply

Risk disclosure: All investments involve a degree of risk of some kind. Trading financial derivative products comes with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.

Top-Tier Regulations. Unmatched Spreads and Commissions. Trading View is available.

T&Cs Apply

Financial Spread Trades and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 84.7% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider.

Modern and Intuitive Interfaces, Solid Regulatory Frame, and excellent Trading Fees.

T&Cs Apply
Risk warning: Trading derivatives is highly speculative, carries an inherent risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Before trading, you are strongly advised to read and ensure that you understand the relevant risk disclosures and warnings.

Highly Regulated. Low Spreads and Commissions. Vast Account Options.

T&Cs Apply

Risk Warning: Trading derivatives carries significant risks. It is not suitable for all investors and if you are a professional client, you could lose substantially more than your initial investment.