By Kate Abnett

BRUSSELS (Reuters) -A European Union plan to label investments in and nuclear power plants as climate-friendly will be put to a final vote on Wednesday when lawmakers decide whether to accept or reject proposals that have divided governments and investors.

The vote is the final hurdle in the EU’s long-delayed decision on whether to add the two energy sources to its “taxonomy”, a rulebook determining which investments can be marketed in Europe as sustainable.

Designed to guide private capital towards truly green projects, the rules aim to set a European standard for sustainable investment and stamp out greenwashing.

But the debate has grown into a broader political standoff over which fuels Europe should invest in to fight climate change. Opponents say natural gas, a fossil fuel that produces carbon dioxide when burned, should not be labelled “green.” Backers say gas is cleaner than other fuels like coal and Europe must use it while transitioning to renewable energy sources.

The invasion of Ukraine by Russia, Europe’s top gas supplier, has sharpened that debate.

Supporters say the proposal would aid infrastructure to import more non-Russian gas. Critics point out the rules cover power plants, but not the liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals that would facilitate extra imports.

A debate in the Parliament on Tuesday, ahead of Wednesday’s vote, laid bare those divisions.

Socialist lawmaker Simona Bonafe, an opponent of the proposal, said it would mislead citizens and investors by labelling gas as climate-friendly.

“It labels as green something that isn’t green,” she said.

European People’s Party lawmaker Christian Ehler, a supporter, said the rules reflected Europe’s pathway towards renewable energy.

“Welcome to reality. We know that for a transitional time we need gas and nuclear,” he said.

Officials expect a tight vote. A majority of the European Parliament’s 705 lawmakers would be needed to block the rules.

Rejection would be a blow to the European Commission, which has spent more than a year redrafting the rules amid lobbying from governments and the gas and nuclear industries.

EU financial services commissioner Mairead McGuinness on Tuesday defended the proposal, which she said imposed strict criteria on gas and nuclear projects seeking the green investment label.

“There is no obligation on any private investor to invest in nuclear or gas,” she added.

Critics, including the Commission’s advisers, have said gas plants would need to meet far tougher emissions limits than those in the Commission proposal to align with the steep CO2 cuts needed to avert severe climate change.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A general view of the hemicycle at the European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium, February 24, 2016. REUTERS/Yves Herman

The Commission had included a lower emissions limit in an early proposal in 2020 but amended it after backlash from some of the bloc’s 27 member states.

($1 = 0.9595 euros)




Source link

Best Brokers

Unmatched trading fees, generous bonuses, top notch Regulation Frame.

T&Cs Apply

Risk disclosure: All investments involve a degree of risk of some kind. Trading financial derivative products comes with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.

Top-Tier Regulations. Unmatched Spreads and Commissions. Trading View is available.

T&Cs Apply

Financial Spread Trades and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 84.7% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider.

Modern and Intuitive Interfaces, Solid Regulatory Frame, and excellent Trading Fees.

T&Cs Apply
Risk warning: Trading derivatives is highly speculative, carries an inherent risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Before trading, you are strongly advised to read and ensure that you understand the relevant risk disclosures and warnings.

Highly Regulated. Low Spreads and Commissions. Vast Account Options.

T&Cs Apply

Risk Warning: Trading derivatives carries significant risks. It is not suitable for all investors and if you are a professional client, you could lose substantially more than your initial investment.